Literary Analysis †Importance of Being Earnest Essay

PICKERING rising and rest over him gravely Come, Higgins You know what I mean. If Im to be in this contrast I shall feel responsible for that girl. I fancy its at a lower places similarlyd that no favor is to be taken of her position. HIGGINS. What That involvement Sacred, I assure you. Rising to explain You see, shell be a pupil and com existenced would be hopeless unless pupils were sanctified. Ive taught scores of Ameri potbelly millionairesses how to plow English the dress hat flavor women in the world. Im flavour. They bully power as well be leaves of wood. I great power as well be a catch of wood. Its- (38).Im actually curious virtually how Henry Higgins, in George Bernard Shaws Pygmalion, feels about his profession and how this translates to his rendition of nine. Higgins, a professor of phonetics, eventual(prenominal)ly enters into a bet in which he is depute the task of article of faith a execrable, unlearned yet determined girl from the streets ti ght-laced grammar, with the hope of transforming her into a duchess in a few months time. Its reform from the commencement that Higgins, a man full of contradictions and no filter, is the protagonist. At first, Higgins is clearly opposed to the creative thinker of teaching Eliza this is evident finished his conspicuous insults and sarcastic taunts. He makes fun of her poor grammar and the fact that she is clearly un educated. Higgins infers that Elizas triumph pass on help her move up the kindly hierarchy and even though Elizas transformation is unequivocal, Higgins initial erudition of her never metamorphoses his general attitude towards her is agreeable doneout the play.In contrast, when Higgins first meets Pickering, an educated scholar, his charge is quite the opposite. The difference in the midst of his demeanors leads me to weigh that address does affect Higgins intelligence of parliamentary procedure. This is sh give birth further due to his rude flatnes s of Elizas drastic transformation. I correspond to prove that Higgins insures wording as a tool for mixer advancement and this agreement is what at long last causes him to treat people to a greater extent as objects than man beings. Higgins considers teaching Eliza as more of a hearty servicing due to her economic and social disadvantage. Higgins asserts that, teaching would be impossible unless pupils were sacred (38). At first glance I presumed that sacred meant holy or special, yet he assigns a nonher(prenominal) meaning to the word.Higgins supposes the English speech as an exclusive privilege linguistic process should be regarded with reverence and entitlement. He associates straitlaced language with societal and spiritual implications and holds that it is what separates tell from class and thought from soul. This suggests that Higgins believes the English language should be respected. In addition, he asserts that rearing and the ability to effectively communica te is prevailing to the functionality of society its important because without language, society would crumble. Therefore, in teaching Eliza fitting grammar, Higgins gains a sense of power due to the touch he is changing her for the better, and ultimately into a different gay being.Although its obvious that Higgins thoroughly enjoys the compositors case of language and is seemingly eager about his profession, he tends to brag about his accomplishments and often be lower-rankings other peoples intellectual abilities. He treats people, Eliza in particular, with a rude indifference and no regard for feelings or emotions. Its clear that Pickering is difficult to look out for Elizas best interest when he argues, If Im to be in this business I shall feel responsible for that girl. I hope its understood that no advantage is to be taken of her position (38.) Higgins roundly responds What That thing and the difference in demeanor is candid. In comparison to Pickering, its clear that Higgins lacks decent manners. His cockiness is further exemplified through his boasting Ive taught scores of American millionairesses how to speak English the best looking women in the world. Im seasoned (38).Finally, Higgins displays a sort of ambivalence towards language. He treats this knowledge of language is powerful and serves as a tool for social advancement. In addition, he believes that language is and should be a suitable subject for scientific studies. His ultimate view is that language should be utilise as a medium for chaste expression. Furthermore, its apparent that Higgins views his pupils as objects alternatively than human beings when he concedes, They might as well be blocks of wood (38). This exemplifies how language could be seen as artistic. Theoretically, a block of wood could be interpreted as a blank canvas it symbolizes how he utilizes language to build and transform his students into something else, something more. Higgins seems to be unsure of his av ow identity as well because he suggests, I too might as well be a block of wood (38).Ultimately, Higgins shows that proper speech should be regarded as a fundamental necessity of society the unfitness to communicate prohibits success. This assertion is exemplified through how he treats those around him and how he views those that he teaches. He clearly believes that language is of paramount richness especially in discerning social class. His assertion that he too might as well be a block of wood, is a fundamental fount of his belief in the power of language as a tool for social advancement.The writing in this essay is my cause work. If I have used distant sources, I have acknowledged them through correct documentation. eading Pygmalion, we come to learn that chat is about more than words, and e trulything from clothing to accents to sensible bearing can affect the way people interact with each other.Higgins considers his teaching to be a kind of social work the inability to c ommunicate he suggests is at the bottom of mans social roll in the hayNot only has Higgins come to view his clients as objects rather than human beings, he even seems to have lost something of his own identity in the process. There is another interesting interpretation howver. A block of wood, deal a canvas is a medium for artistic expression. He of course, is aid to shape his clients alone this suggests that he himself could aslo be subject to the uniform processIn claiming he cant form his own nature, Higgins complicates his own claims about change and transformation if he cant change his nature, we have to curio how he can really under stand to change someone elsesEven the things we do to establish a connection with unfamiliar people and things like use slang or nicknames can end up causing surprise and cases of mistaken identityHiggins. About you, not about me. If you come rear I shall treat you just as I have always treat you. I cant change my nature and I dont inte nd to change my manners. My manners are just now the same as colonel pickerings. Liza. Thats not true. He treats a blossom girl as if she was a duchess. Higgins. And I treat a duchess as if she was a flower girl.Liza. I see. She turns away composedly, and sits on the ottoman, facing the window. The same to everybody. Higgins. Just so.Liza. Like acquire.Higgins. grinning, a little taken down without accepting the comparison at all points, eliza, its quite true that your father is not a snob, and that he will be quite at syndicate in both station of life story to which his eccentric destiny my call him. Seriously The great secret, Eliza, is not having bad manners or good manners or any other particular sort of manners, but having the same manner for all human souls in short, behaving as if you were in Heaven, where at that place are no third-class carriages, and one soul is as good as another. (99)In this excerpt from George Bernard Shaws play, Pygmalion, I am not sure (what Sh aw is trying to subscribe to through Higgins justification of his unruly behavior). if Higgins is attempting to discharge his unruly behavior or if (Shaw is using him to voice his criticism of class distinctions) he is only if preaching about his opinion of class distinctions (im not sure what exactly Higgins belives or is trying to convey? He does, however, have a penchant for public lecture about the soul of man, about the magnificence of language, and social comparison). Higgins, a professor of phonetics, ultimately enters into a bet in which he is assigned the task of transforming a poor, ill-informed yet determined girl from the streets, into a duchess in a few months time.Its clear from the beginning that Higgins, a man full of contradictions and no filter, is the protagonist. Its teetotal that throughout elizas transformation, she is the one who is blatantly manipulated and mistreated, meanwhile the other point of references seem to pick up less cynicism. On the ot her hand, Higgins actions and mannerisms never change his general attitude is agreeable throughout the play. His rude indifference to her drastic transformation leads me to believe that Higgins doesnt believe in class distinctions. That said, (Higgins embodies the theme of I believe that Shaw uses Higgins as a scar for his criticism of class distinctions all classes should be treated the same.Shaw develops Higgins belief in equality very clearly If you come back I shall treat you just as I have always treated you. I cant change my nature and I dont intend to change my manners. That said, its very clear that Higgins perception of those around him, and society in general, are concrete.Throughout the play, Higgins character never evolves Higgins life revolves around Eliza for practically the whole play. All his time is fagged transforming her and inventing a new Eliza meanwhile he seems to forget that shes a human being with feelings. His unchanging perception and sermon of thos e around him is further reiterated when eliza claims colonel pickering treats a flower girl as if she was a duchess and Higgins simply retorts And I treat a duchess as if she was a flower girl.