Abortion: Where Has Morality Gone?

Joan Didions es ante up tongue to, On piety, poses the appargonnt motion, What is properly and what is wrong, what is good and what evil? (182). In forthwiths society, a good deal clock times some people do non even consider this question before taking action. Morality has become a grayness area in which incorrupts can scarcely be defined. For instance, Merriam Websters Collegiate Dictionary defines religion as the quality of world in accord with standards of ripe or good conduct. However, every 1 has a different opinion of right and wrong. This difference of opinion on what is incorrupt causes legion(predicate) disputes much(prenominal) as in the subject of spontaneous miscarriage. Some people mean it is a charwomans prerogative to aim whether or non to shake a claw, while console many other(a)s believe it is mor tout ensembley wrong. On the other hand, on that point are moderates who disagree with the head or the devotion of spontaneous ab ortion, exclusively agree that there are certain spate that should distribute the woman the option. Since abortion is prefatoryally the chargeing of an unborn child, wherefore are women who abort non convicted as send offers; just as women who kill their children face such(prenominal) charges? Morality should be a standard at all times and abortion should be no turn oution. In fact, abortion is destroying the emotional statetime of a child; therefore, it should be considered deterrent examplely wrong, except when extenuating circumstances digress no other filling for the woman. \n\nWhile deciding whether to be pro-life or pro- superior, many people consider the moral aspect of abortion and its consequences. On the pro- survival of the fittest side, a woman should consider the right to fill whether or non she wants to chip in birth. The argument is that it is her body and she is the one who will apply the tariff of caring for that child. The problem, howe ver, with this argument is that it does not take into consideration whether abortion is right or wrong, and it does not deal with the morality of the issue. However, the arguments of the pro-life side may be more correct solely because they constrain a moral judgment. In Merriam-Websters Collegiate Dictionary, abortion is defined as the expiration of a pregnancy often accompanied by, resulting in, or well-nigh followed by the death of an conceptus or fetus. It is the violent death of an unborn child. Although morality is hard to define, the wide majority of society agrees that murder is wrong; therefore, abortion should be considered immoral as well. In warble Gilligans essay, Concepts of Self and Morality, a college student responds to the question of what morality should be by saying, The basic idea that I cohere to is the sanctitude of benevolent life (171). There should not be a question of choice in the matter of abortion, because when a woman chooses to have an abortion, she for trains the sanctity of human life and she forgets her morals, which is, definitely, wrong. \n \nConsequently, pro-lifers flop believe that when a woman is pregnant, it should not be time to come to a choice of whether or not to have that child; she has already do that choice, by being pregnant. The nub of moral decision is the lick of choice and the willingness to accept province for that choice (Gilligan 172). The woman has already made the choice to have sexual intercourse and it is up to her to accept business for that choice. other student in Carol Gilligans essay responds to the question, What does it mean to say something is morally right or wrong? Her response is, It has to do with responsibilities and obligations and value, mainly values (170). When a woman becomes pregnant, she has to accept the obligation that comes with it. Where have a womans values gone if she can consciously make the choice to kill a child that is evolution inside her and is part of her birth body? \n \nNevertheless, although there is no doubt that abortion is immoral, there are certain circumstances where it may be gratifying to perform abortions. For casing, if a womans life is threatened by her braggy birth, then an abortion should be performed to save her life. Another example is if a woman is looted and she becomes pregnant as a consequence of that rape, then it is comprehensible that she would not want to give birth and care for that child, because it will always bring defend memories of the horrible incident. However, as a student says in Gilligans essay, A viable society cant make exceptions all the time (Gilligan 170), other than these specific situations, abortions should not be performed. \n\nIn the end, abortion is murder, and it is morally wrong. Where has morality gone if killing unborn innocent children happens everyday without the blink of an eye? many another(prenominal) people go on with their lives and try to just fend off this controversial topic. They see the rallies against abortion on television and pitch the channel, but never wonder, what if my let had made the choice to abort me, would I be alive today? So, abortion is not a matter of choice, but a matter of taking responsibility for choices and actions and caring for another human life, because If there is an absolute for moral decisions, it is human life (Gilligan 171), therefore, abortion is, certainly, morally wrong. \n\n If you want to get a full essay, hunting lodge it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.