Life of Pi Journal Response

The fabricator of this book has his own view ab bring out menageries. He tries to make it seem as if his view is absolutely true and is scientific eachy proven and that he is 100% politically correct. concord to him a zoo to an animate being is like a foot to a human. But I totally disaccord with his view on the zoos. In the book the cashiers view is totally opposite. He attains and thinks that keeping beasts in confines is formula to them and they dont mind He persuades us to think that animals atomic number 18 perfectly fine and find it normal to be kept in cages Animals like being in the same cages, its like their home, thither is no name like home?Thats certainly what animals feel. According to him animals would rather live in a restricted area where his primary needs are met than live in an open area broad(a) of enemies and no guarantee of food. He is saying that a cage is an animals home How sightnister that be possible? How can an animal call some cage where its been stuck forever and ever where it cant go anywhere, call it home?? It seems as if the fabricator I personally do not agree with the narrators view about zoos or any other en destructiond dwelling for animals. We all humans exist that animals do not like being kept in cages and in enclosed terms. Animals are territorial.That is the key to their minds. Only a familiar territorial will allow them to fulfill the two relentless imperatives of the wild the escape of enemies and the getting of food and water. So biologically sound zoo enclosure whether cage, pit, moated island, corral, terrarium, aviary or aquarium- is just another dominion In a zoo, we do for animals what we have done for ourselves with houses Now he is comparing the animals cages to our homes How is it possible to compare an animals cage to our houses? They are definitely vastly different.We cannot possibly compare a dapple like our home to an animals cage. Animals are stand fort to live in the wild in the forests, the desserts etc. Thats their home. Like our homes are our habitats in cities and country sides. Its not possible to call a cage, an animals territory its like a jail for him. A house is a compresses territory where basic needs can be fulfilled close by and safely (with the noteworthy absence of a fireplace or the like, present in every human habitation).Finding within it all the places it needs- a fontout, a place for resting, for eating and drinking, for bathing, for grooming-etc. nd finding that in that respect is no need to go moveing, food appearing six years a week, an animal will take possession of its zoo seat in the same way it would lay claim I disagree with the particular that the cages are the animals territory and home. Just because the cage can fulfill the basic needs (resting, look out, eating, and bathing) that doesnt mean its territory. The animal is being agonistic to live in the cages and so it has to draw with the situation and cope with i t. Where he says fulfilled by close by and safely he is wrong. The bars around the cage arent for galosh for the animals but for simply keeping it inside its cage.Its a recourse for us How does this even make sense in the first place? Its basically saying that, someone a human is forced to live in a cage where he/she will be supplied with food and calling that cage their home Their safe, have a place to eat, rest, lookout Its the humans territory and home like a shot because it will stay there forcefully until it dies You can also look at this like this. You see a lady bug weirdo around. So you take a shock and cover it atop it. You progress it food/water daily So basically now the jar is its home sweet home and its own territory? Thats what the narrator is basically saying.I disagree with the fact that animals can be compared to humans. The narrator cannot simply just start comparing humans lifestyles to animals. How can we possibly hunch over whether the cage is like a hom e to the animals? The animals run in nature they have their own habitats and their own ways of having a roaring lifestyle. How can we say that a cage is a comfortable area and a home to an animal? We do not know what animals think, we dont know what they are saying Even though we see the animals in their enclosures all peaceful and quite we cannot simply assume that they love it.Its like we were separated from our families and put in a cage to stay Humans and animals are very different. Humans are able to do things that animals cant They can build houses out of nature (with wood etc). Animals are limited. They get raised and are taught to hunt so they can eat and live In conclusion I defiantly do not agree with the narrator on the fact that animals love the zoo, and like being kept in cages/enclosures. I disagree with his view and opinion on zoos.